Saturday, February 28, 2009


Snowmobiling is big business in Northern New England. Really big business.

A 2004 study by Plymouth (New Hampshire) State University and the Institute for New Hampshire Studies suggests just how big.

In the winter of 2003, the total impact on New Hampshire's economy by snowmobilers was nearly $1.2 billion. It represented 1% of the gross state product and more than 10% of all travel spending in the state.

The average New Hampshire resident snowmobiler made 12 trips per season, some of which included overnight stays. The average non-resident snowmobiler made nine trips to New Hampshire each season.

Average per-person, per-day spending in New Hampshire was $67.07 per resident snowmobiler and $88.30 per non-resident. In addition to spending on their trips, each snowmobiler spends $1,830 annually on equipment, clothing, club memberships, insurance and state license fees.

I like motor vehicles. I like the excitement of going fast, and a fast snowmobile provides plenty of excitement. Racing at 90 mph across a snow-covered pond on a snowmobile generates a 200 mph adreneline rush.

Snowmobiles are a lot of fun, and they provide transportation for people living in far northern climes. They also provide a livelihood for many people.

All that being said, snowmobiles are one of the most environmentally unfriendly devices invented by man. Riding a gas guzzling, pollution spewing, motor vehicle into the woods for entertainment is an environmental felony.

All winter, I see caravans of giant 4-wheel drive pickups and SUVs dragging huge trailers full of snow machines up and down the interstate at 70-80 mph. These 10-mpg rigs burn large amounts of fuel and leave behind a wake of hydrocarbon haze. When they reach their destination, they disgorge packs of 10-mpg snow machines which race through the woods burning large amounts of fuel and leaving behind wakes of hydrocarbon haze.

Snowmobiling has become such big business that we justify the felony by saying that it’s vital to the economy. How about looking at the real cost?

Snowmobiles consume an unacceptable amount of precious fossil fuel and pump an unacceptable amount of pollution into our precious atmosphere for the entertainment of a few people.

When does entertainment become too costly?


  1. Hi Karl: Better tread softly when it comes to snowmobiles. In the northcountry they rate right up there with God. Here is a little trivia...There are more snowmobile roads in NH than there are auto roads. (Bet you didn't know that one). What in hell are you doing up at 3:43 AM writing anyway....

  2. Are there quiet, electric, snow machines?

  3. No, there aren't electric snowmobiles. The lack of performance would defeat the purpose. Karl: have you ever ridden one? Do you have any idea how small the tanks are and how long they last? Think about the percentage of states that even have a suitable climate for snowmobiling, then think about how long that season lasts. How can you argue that it's so harmful to the environment when it's typically the alternative to driving a big 4x4 V-8 around all winter? No full-size truck that I know of can get 25 mpg. Being from North Dakota, I would say that the percentage of people who stay home, along with their cars, for most of the winter brings far more environmental relief than in non-snowmobiling season without them, assuming that we have any power to "relieve" the environment, or bring harm to it, for that matter.

    Leave our snowmobiles alone, or else start bashing on the high performance, supercharged V-8 and V-10 European sports cars that fill the roads in the southern and coastal states, YEAR-ROUND.