The Epstein Quagmire

The American public needs to know who was involved in the sexual abuse of children with Jeffrey Epstein and who was not. I don’t want pedophiles running our county and using their positions to cover their tracks and those of their friends. I particularly want to know if the President of the United States is a pedophile.

This scandal has undermined the confidence of American voters in their government and their elected officials. We can’t tell the bad guys from the good guys. This is not a Republican or a Democrat issue. It’s neither conservative nor liberal. It’s a moral and legal issue.

Child sexual abuse may be the worst crime. It permanently damages the lives of its victims who often live in pain for years. I know from first-hand experience.

We need to know whether our Senators and Representatives support getting this investigation out in the open so voters know the morality of the people they cast their votes for. Please email yours and demand they tell you.

Are All Men Created Equal?

The Declaration of Independence boldly proclaims:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

When the American colonists declared independence from the British crown, they staked their lives on the radical belief that government should exist only with the consent of the governed. After winning their freedom from the tyranny of King George, they embedded this principle into the Constitution that established their new republic.

But what does it really mean to say that “all men are created equal”—nearly 250 years after Jefferson first penned those words?

Competing Views of Equality
Today, Democrats and Republicans often interpret the phrase in very different ways.

Conservative Republicans argue that Jefferson’s words were meant to assert equality only between the colonists and the English aristocracy. They often emphasize that wealth, power, and privilege naturally produce different rules and outcomes for different groups in society. To them, inequality is not a flaw to be corrected, but a reflection of the natural order.

Progressive Democrats, on the other hand, take Jefferson’s words more literally: that all people in America—regardless of wealth, race, gender, or background—should be treated equally under the law. They believe every citizen deserves an equal opportunity to pursue success and happiness, as well as equal responsibility to contribute to society. In this view, government plays a crucial role in leveling the playing field and ensuring fairness.

Equality in a Capitalist Society
Modern capitalism, combined with rapid advances in technology, has tilted the playing field toward the wealthy. Opportunities are concentrated at the top, while responsibilities and burdens fall more heavily on the working class. This imbalance has created a caste system in America.

The wealthy have the money, time, and connections to shape laws and policies in their favor. The working class often has little influence in government beyond casting a vote, while being constantly bombarded with political propaganda.

This raises the question: does a society built on vast inequality still honor Jefferson’s promise of equal rights? In truth, the phrase “all men are created equal” has always been open to interpretation. Scholars debate its meaning through historical letters and speeches. Politicians invoke it to justify their agendas. Everyday Americans must decide for themselves what it means in practice.

So ask yourself:
Do you believe inequality is simply a fact of life, beyond the reach of government to change?

Or do you believe government has a responsibility to help every citizen pursue life, liberty, and happiness—the very rights promised in the Declaration?

The Goal of Equality
When Jefferson wrote those words in 1776, they were not only a statement of purpose but also a goal for the new nation. That goal remains unfinished. To surrender it now—whether to complacency, propaganda, or greed—would be to betray the very ideals that sparked America’s independence.

We cannot allow entrenched privilege and oligarchic power to keep us from striving toward true equality. The promise of “all men are created equal” is not just history—it is a challenge to each generation to bring it closer to reality.

I'm done

I’m done
ruminating on my failures,
rehashing my mistakes,
cowering in my shame,
beating myself up,
discounting my accomplishments,
feeling sorry for myself,
and making excuses.

I’m done
analyzing
my second-grade trauma,
my adolescent depression,
my college shame,
my business failures,
and my financial losses.

I’m eighty-one.
I’m physically fit.
I’m stubborn.
I have cancer.
I don’t give up.
I’m a survivor.

Why school vouchers create economic disparity

The arguments seem to make sense at first. School vouchers allow low-income children to attend better schools. They get to use their allotment for schooling that will make them more productive citizens. It seems so egalitarian.

In practice, however, it doesn’t work that way at all. Here in New Hampshire, they are called “Education Freedom Accounts". The program was sold as a way to help low-income students in bad public schools transfer to better private schools.

What actually happened is that 75% of the students getting voucher money were already enrolled in private and religious schools.

What vouchers have done is to reinforce class discrimination. And wealthy Americans understand that. For all their claims of promoting educational equity, they understand that it gives their children an advantage over working-class children. Their children get to attend private schools on the public dime that leads them to better universities. After college, their children end up with better employment opportunities. And they want it that way. It’s one of their two biggest reasons for championing school vouchers.

The second reason is even more odious. Greed! Vouchers also slash their private school tuition costs at the expense of working-class taxpayers. And now that the limit of income eligibility has been completely eliminated, New Hampshire’s wealthiest families get their tuition paid with your tax dollars.

State Education Commissioner Frank Edelblut has no interest in providing a fair education for all New Hampshire school children. He has advocated for expanding the school voucher program and increasing the amount of public tax dollars going to private and religious schools. He projected that the program would cost $3.3 million. It actually cost $27 million in its first two years of operation.

Here are the facts:

Private school vouchers don’t work in rural New Hampshire.
Vouchers simply don’t provide school choice for students living in rural areas of New Hampshire. If these students are even able to use a voucher, their families probably can’t afford or manage the long, costly commute to a private school.

Private school vouchers don't fully serve low-income students.
The cost of tuition, books, uniforms and fees at private or religious schools that accept vouchers usually exceeds the voucher amount. This makes these schools unaffordable for most low-income families.

Private school vouchers undermine New Hampshire’s public schools.
Vouchers divert desperately needed public resources away from our public school systems to fund the education of a few students at private schools. We could better serve our children by using these funds to make the public schools stronger.

Private school vouchers do not save money for New Hampshire taxpayers.
The reduction in students from those public schools from which students leave for private voucher schools does not decrease their operating costs. It costs the same to run a public school for 200 students as it does for 210, but vouchered students take their share with them. This creates public school deficits and tax increases.

Private school vouchers do not lead to improvements in public schools.
To the contrary – by siphoning off public school funds, vouchers make it more difficult for public schools to make improvements.

As a result, most New Hampshire school vouchers are used by wealthy families whose children never attended public schools in the first place. These families can afford to pay private school tuition without help from working-class taxpayers. Private school vouchers are simply a way for wealthy families to get a taxpayer-funded discount on their private school tuition. And our public schools, which educate 90% of the state’s students, pay the price.

Vouchers not only widen the educational gap between working-class and wealthy families. They reinforce economic disparity.